[author: Blair Robinson]*
Several artists, frustrated with Artificially Intelligent (AI) image generators skirting copyright laws, are using AI-image generators to produce images of Mickey Mouse and other copyrighted characters to challenge the current legal status of AI art. While an artist’s copyright in a work typically vests at the moment of fixation, including the right to prosecute copyright violation, AI-generated work complicates the issue by removing humans from the creative process. Courts have ruled that AI cannot hold copyright, which by corollary also means that AI-generated art sits in the public domain. This legal loophole has angered many professional artists whose art is used to train the AI. Many AI generators, such as Dall-E 2 and Midjourney, can render pieces in the style of a human artist, effectively automating the artist’s job.
Given Disney’s reputation for vigorously defending its intellectual property, these artists hope that monetizing these public-domain AI Mickeys on mugs and T-shirts will prompt a lawsuit. Ironically, provoking and losing a case in this vein may set a favorable precedent for the independent artist community. As AI becomes more advanced, society will likely need to address how increasingly intelligent and powerful AI can complicate and undermine existing law.
*Non-Lawyer Intern
[View source.]
ncG1vNJzZmivp6x7q7DSrqermV6YvK57y56emqSemsS0e8Crq6KrpKh6or7EZqqepJyeu6h5wKJkoJ2emr%2BiwMSdZKKlkZyytHmVbnBqamdtfA%3D%3D